Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The development of deepwater and offshore engineering has imposed increasingly stringent requirements on the axial-compression stability and load-carrying efficiency of lightweight composite tubular structures. Although continuous variable-angle filament winding enables spatial tailoring of fiber orientations, variations in winding angle also alter trajectory spacing, fiber coverage, and wall-thickness distribution. The effects of this manufacturing-induced nonuniformity on axial buckling and ultimate load-carrying capacity remain insufficiently understood. In this study, a continuous fiber-angle field was prescribed to generate frictionally stable non-geodesic winding trajectories. The corresponding equivalent natural-thickness distribution induced by fiber coverage variations was then determined. The resulting fiber-angle and thickness fields were jointly mapped onto a finite element model and validated against published benchmarks. Within the angle range of 55°-61° at constant thickness, angle continuity changes the critical buckling load by only 0.17%, whereas natural-thickness redistribution increases it by 25.49%. After mass normalization, the improvement remains 9.40%. For the baseline imperfect models, the continuous-angle-natural-thickness configuration exhibits a 39.26% higher peak load than the engineering reference configuration. These results show that path-induced thickness redistribution and the resulting axial stiffness gradient enhance load-carrying capacity while reducing imperfection sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: