Canada’s emergency governance model no longer aligns with a risk environment shaped by accelerating climate change and increasingly complex multi-hazard events. Recent federal/provincial/territorial strategies acknowledge these growing pressures but have not materially reoriented federal leadership toward anticipatory risk governance, resulting in persistent gaps across jurisdictions. Using a conceptual analysis grounded in risk governance, resilience, and comparative federalism, this paper identifies four structural limitations that constrain national readiness: (1) fragmented situational awareness, (2) interoperability deficits, (3) a reactive federal posture, and (4) incomplete Indigenous integration. We propose a reshaped federal leadership model that operates continuously across the disaster cycle. The framework provides a concrete federal pathway linking governance theory to implementable design choices capable of strengthening national readiness and resilience in an era of compounding risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hertelendy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: