Graduate education remains a racially stratified environment in which students’ sense of belonging has important implications for persistence, well-being, and professional development. Drawing on survey data from graduate students at a large, research-intensive university, this study examines how identity safety cues , specifically relational cues from faculty and curricular cues reflecting racial inclusion, are associated with belonging among Asian, Black, Latinx, and multiracial students. Using race-disaggregated regression analyses, we assess whether these institutional signals operate similarly across racial groups. Across all groups, relational cues from white faculty emerged as the strongest and most consistent predictor of belonging. Associations between cues from faculty of color varied by race, while curricular cues were positively associated with belonging among all groups except Black students. Findings indicate that belonging is not produced through symbolic inclusion alone but through institutional relationships and curricular design, and that protective conditions for belonging differ by race. Results point to the need for equity efforts that extend beyond representation toward sustained investments in faculty practice and curriculum as infrastructure for belonging in graduate education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: