We investigate the exact memory complexity of zero-error online encoding under blind coordinate overwrites. A finite-state encoder maintains a binary record through successive assignments, while a decoder reconstructs erased coordinates using the stored state and the remaining visible coordinates. Our analysis establishes a general lower bound on online state complexity through incidence counting and extremal binary coding theory. For an update horizon T and an erasure budget q, write s = T + q, and let A(n,s) denote the maximum size of a binary code of length n and minimum distance at least s. The resulting state-complexity bound is K ≥ 2^n(s + 1) / (A(n,s) + s). This leads to an exact saturation theorem: when T ≥ 1 and s ≥ ⌈n/2⌉ + 1, the optimal online memory requirement reaches n bits. We establish an explicit infinite family exhibiting a sharp logarithmic separation between online and static memory. For n = 4(2^k − 1), T = 1, and q = n/2, the optimal online memory requirement is n bits, while the static optimum is n − k bits. The resulting separation is exactly k = log₂(n/4 + 1). A column-completion construction extends logarithmic separation to all sufficiently large block lengths, yielding a gap of at least (2/3)log₂n − O(log log n). Further results include horizon-uniform memory bounds, multiround pair-amplification inequalities, and exact compatibility-graph colorings for syndrome encoders constructed through affine-subspace deletion from Hamming parity-check matrices. These results connect the state complexity of online information maintenance with extremal coding theory and algebraic graph coloring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zinan Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: