Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) frameworks are increasingly recognised, not just as instruments for compliance but also as a strategy for sustainable competitive advantage. Though this is a progressive development, there are identifiable gaps in the research that views ESG as a valuable, rare, inimitable and organised tool for business sustainability and not just a compliance obligation. This research examines the strategic significance of ESG frameworks in improving business sustainability and competitiveness across various countries. The data used in the research are mainly secondary data, and a qualitative comparative approach was applied. The secondary data used were sourced from corporations’ public disclosures, regulatory policies and ESG performance reports in the United Kingdom, the United States and Nigeria. The research focuses on the integration of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) concepts within organisations’ everyday governance structures and corporate responsibility. The study indicates that organisations that deliberately implement ESG frameworks are more successful in securing investors’ trust, customers’ loyalty and employees’ commitments while upscaling regulatory compliance. The research discovered that ESG frameworks are not without challenges, mainly the lack of uniform regulations across jurisdictions. Even within the same jurisdiction, there are different frameworks, and the disparity has made comparative research complex. Despite these issues, companies that diligently and consistently implement ESG frameworks foster innovation, ethical governance and value creation to gain a competitive advantage over counterparts in the same industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Funmi S. Olatoye (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: