Supplementary Materials: Written Word Boundaries and Lexical-Semantic Judgments of Indonesian Compounds This supplementary document accompanies a research article submitted to Cogent Arts & Humanities. It provides additional methodological documentation, experimental stimuli, item-level results, and robustness analyses for an investigation of orthographic word boundaries and lexical-semantic judgments of Indonesian compounds. The document includes detailed exploratory results from Study 1 (N = 117), documentation of the complementary-list design used in Study 2 (N = 170), orthographic stimulus lists, and analyses of familiarity, perceived commonness, semantic transparency, and spelling naturalness. It also presents an orthographic codification audit based on EYD V, a post-hoc frequency analysis of 24 orthographic pairs using the Leipzig Indonesian News Corpus 2024 (1,000,000 sentences), and exploratory sensitivity analyses. Additional sections document the internal-modification task, statistical specifications, participant composition, and response-category distributions. This deposit contains the supplementary document only. Individual participant responses, executable analysis code, and the full Leipzig corpus are not included.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lalira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: