Traditional clinical psychoanalysis and trauma psychology predominantly treat psychological defense mechanisms—specifically intellectualization and aestheticization—as maladaptive barriers to emotional integration that require dismantling. This paper challenges this deficit-oriented paradigm by proposing a model of defensive instrumentalization. Drawing upon existential philosophy, post-traumatic growth frameworks, and conceptual art theory, we examine how individuals with high-resolution metacognitive monitoring actively refashion defensive architecture into deliberate, high-performance creative tools. Rather than attempting to eliminate trauma-induced coping routines, the sovereign self acknowledges their protective origins, re-authors their narrative meaning, and deploys them as pragmatic instruments for interdisciplinary synthesis, aesthetic curation, and existential play. This paradigm shifts the locus of identity from passive victimhood to active conceptual artistry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Min Jinseong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: