Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The soil organic carbon (SOC) pool is larger than the biotic and atmospheric carbon pools, and understanding cultivated land SOC is critical for evaluating soil fertility and local agricultural management. Digital soil mapping (DSM) efficiently predicts soil properties by utilizing spatially distributed information. To date, many machine learning techniques have been applied in DSM, but model ensemble methods have rarely been used. In this study, two model ensemble methods, including the Granger-Ramanathan averaging and Bayesian model averaging, and three individual mathematical algorithms, such as the random forest, quantile regression forests, and multivariate adaptive regression splines models, were used to estimate SOC at a local level with limited soil samples. The prediction performances of the five methods were compared using an independent validation dataset composed of field observations of soil samples. The results showed that the prediction accuracy of the ensemble methods was higher than that of the individual methods (ΔR2 = 0.02 to 0.21). Compared to the other methods, the Granger-Ramanathan method had a lower root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error and a higher prediction uncertainty. Therefore, the results of this study show the effectiveness of using ensemble methods in mapping SOC with limited soil samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: