Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feeding activity of Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) biotype 3 on five rice cultivars was monitored with an electronic recording device. Cultivars tested were N. lugens-resistant ‘IR56’ with the Bph 3 gene, field-resistant ‘IR36’, ‘IR42’, and ‘Utri Rajapan’, and susceptible ‘Taichung Native 1’, Distinct differences in waveforms for probing, salivation, A waveforms, and ingestion were recorded on resistant and susceptible cultivars. N. lugens probed repeatedly, salivated for a long time, and ingested for a very short period on resistant ‘IR56’ when compared with the susceptible cultivar. Phloem ingestion decreased significantly with an increase in age of ‘IR36’, ‘IR42’, and ‘Utri Rajapan’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velusamy et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: