Key result
Dromedary camel ECGs show low resting rates and preliminary PR intervals of ~180–260 ms.
Why the study?
Available evidence on dromedary-camel ECG measurements, rhythm, and conduction was fragmented and lacked synthesis distinguishing direct electrophysiological studies from supporting cardiovascular reports.
Systematic Review
Current evidence on dromedary camel electrophysiology is highly heterogeneous and limited to preliminary descriptors rather than established reference intervals.
Variable ECG intervals without validated norms limit reliable interpretation in dromedary camels; leaves open the need for standardized reference ranges via prospective studies.
Objective: We aimed to synthesise the available evidence on dromedary-camel electrocardiographic (ECG) measurements, rhythm, and conduction while distinguishing direct electrophysiological studies from supporting cardiovascular reports. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and supplementary sources were searched from inception to 22 December 2025. During revision, the research librarian verified that the saved strategies contained the principal ECG and conduction terms. This verification did not retrieve or screen additional database records. Results: Fifteen primary studies met the eligibility criteria, all involving Camelus dromedarius. Six provided direct ECG or electrical telemetry data, whereas nine provided supporting heart rate, Doppler, echocardiographic, or haemodynamic data that were not used to derive ECG intervals or arrhythmia frequency. Direct studies reported low resting heart rates, atrioventricular conduction times (PR intervals) of approximately 180–260 ms, and drug-associated rhythm or conduction abnormalities. Lead configuration, animal position, recording duration, sampling, and outcome reporting varied substantially. Biological sex was incompletely reported, and no study compared males with females. Conclusions: The directly measured ECG findings are preliminary descriptors rather than validated reference intervals. Confidence is limited by small samples, methodological heterogeneity, the dated search, and possible loss of baseline studies through the executed exposure/context block. The conclusions apply only to Camelus dromedarius. Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), CRD420251169514.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Shamsi et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Camel heart electrophysiology. Electrocardiographic (ECG) measurements was evaluated on Resting heart rates, atrioventricular conduction times, and rhythm or conduction abnormalities. Electrocardiographic measurements in dromedary camels demonstrated low resting heart rates and PR intervals of 180–260 ms, serving as preliminary descriptors rather than validated reference intervals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: