Key result
Systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases increase heart failure risk driven by inflammation, autoantibodies, and biological sex.
Why the study?
Heart failure is an important cardiovascular complication of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases that is only partly explained by conventional risk factors, with inflammation, autoantibodies, and sex potentially influencing myocardial vulnerability and risk assessment.
Do inflammation, autoantibodies, and biological sex modify heart failure risk and mechanisms in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases?
Do inflammation, autoantibodies, and biological sex modify heart failure risk and mechanisms in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases?
Traditional risk scores incompletely capture the heart failure risk in systemic autoimmune diseases, requiring a multimodal, biology-centered approach integrating imaging and biomarkers to identify subclinical myocardial involvement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Warrants caution applying standard HF scores to SARD patients; leaves open prospective validation of inflammation, autoantibody, and sex-specific biomarkers.
Heart failure (HF) is increasingly recognized as an important cardiovascular complication of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), which include rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, Sjögren’s syndrome, and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Excess HF risk is only partly explained by conventional cardiovascular risk factors and ischemic heart disease. Chronic inflammation, endothelial and coronary microvascular dysfunction, immune-mediated myocardial injury, oxidative stress, fibrosis, and selected autoantibody-associated pathways may contribute to progressive myocardial dysfunction. Biological sex is also relevant because most SARDs predominantly affect women and sex influences immune regulation, vascular biology, myocardial remodeling, and HF phenotype. Current cardiovascular risk scores are primarily designed for atherosclerotic events and incompletely capture autoimmune disease-specific determinants of myocardial injury. This review summarizes HF across major SARDs and examines three interconnected modifiers of myocardial vulnerability—chronic inflammation, autoantibodies, and biological sex. We further discuss how disease activity and duration, biomarkers, global longitudinal strain, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and conventional risk factors might be integrated into future risk assessment. A biology-centered approach may enable earlier recognition of subclinical myocardial involvement and individualized cardiovascular surveillance, but prospective validation is required before disease-specific HF-screening strategies can be recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Løgstrup et al. (2026) conducted a review in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases (SARDs). Systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) was evaluated. Chronic inflammation, autoantibodies, and biological sex independently contribute to an increased risk of heart failure in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, necessitating disease-specific risk assessment strategies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: