Key result
Longer QRS duration is linked to ~62% lower risk of post-esophagectomy anastomotic leakage per SD.
Why the study?
Early physiological signals for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy remain limited, prompting investigation of routinely reported perioperative ECG QRS measurements.
Are shorter perioperative QRS duration and a leftward frontal-plane QRS axis associated with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy?
Cohort (n=292)
No
Are shorter perioperative QRS duration and a leftward frontal-plane QRS axis associated with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy?
Shorter QRS duration and a more leftward frontal-plane QRS axis on perioperative ECG are independently associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy, serving as potential early physiological warning signals.
May flag higher anastomotic leak risk after esophagectomy; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy is a serious complication for which early physiological signals remain limited. We conducted a hypothesis-generating analysis of whether routinely reported electrocardiographic QRS measurements were associated with AL during the perioperative period. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort included 292 of 1,441 patients undergoing esophagectomy who had an index 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) from day −1 through postoperative day 1. ECG acquisition followed routine clinical practice rather than a study protocol. QRS duration and frontal-plane QRS axis were retained after descriptive screening of the continuous ECG measurements available in the analytic extract. They were entered into a two-variable logistic model, followed by a sensitivity model additionally adjusting for seven clinical characteristics. Timing-stratified associations and same-cohort model discrimination were also examined. Results AL occurred in 29 of 292 patients (9.9%). Patients with AL had a shorter QRS duration (median, 86 vs. 92 ms; P = 0.016) and a more leftward QRS axis (4 degrees vs. 27 degrees; P = 0.006). In the two-variable model, standardized odds ratios (ORs) were 0.378 (95% CI, 0.178-0.801) for QRS duration and 0.501 (0.323-0.779) for QRS axis. In the sensitivity model, the corresponding ORs were 0.359 (0.170-0.761) and 0.486 (0.299-0.789). The QRS-axis association was stronger preoperatively, whereas the QRS-duration association was stronger from day 0 through postoperative day 1. Median repeated-cross-validation AUCs were 0.702 for the ECG model, 0.559 for the clinical reference model, and 0.690 for the combined model; bootstrap confidence intervals for both AUC differences versus the clinical reference included zero. Conclusion Shorter QRS duration and a more leftward frontal-plane QRS axis were associated with AL after esophagectomy. These QRS measurements are potential perioperative signals that require prospective validation rather than established predictors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy (n=292). Perioperative QRS duration and frontal-plane QRS axis was evaluated on Anastomotic leakage (OR 0.378, 95% CI 0.178-0.801, p=0.011). Shorter perioperative QRS duration and a more leftward frontal-plane QRS axis were significantly associated with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy (OR 0.378 and OR 0.501 per 1-SD increase, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: