Key result
Incretin training linked to ~2.5-fold higher odds of prescribing GLP-1 therapies beyond diabetes.
Why the study?
Real-world prescribing behaviors and clinician perceptions of GLP-1 receptor agonists beyond diabetes management remain heterogeneous, particularly regarding gastrointestinal tolerability and cardiometabolic benefit.
Cross-Sectional (n=160)
Odds Ratio: 2.48 (95% CI 1.23–5)
Absolute Event Rate: 81.2% vs 58.2%
p-value: p=0.011
A substantial majority of clinicians are prescribing GLP-1 receptor agonists beyond diabetes management, driven by cardiometabolic benefit expectations but constrained by significant gastrointestinal tolerability issues and access barriers.
Training may associate with broader GLP-1 prescribing beyond diabetes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before informing education or practice.
Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are increasingly used beyond diabetes, yet real-world prescribing behaviors and clinician perceptions remain heterogeneous, particularly regarding gastrointestinal tolerability and cardiometabolic benefit. Objective: To characterize prescribing patterns and clinician perceptions of GLP-1–based therapies beyond diabetes management and identify factors associated with beyond-diabetes prescribing. Methods: A crosssectional clinician survey (N=160) assessed clinician characteristics, prescribing behaviors, titration strategy, gastrointestinal adverse-event (GI-AE) discontinuation, perceived benefits (weight, cardiovascular, heart failure), perceived GI risk, and implementation barriers. The primary outcome was clinician-reported prescribing beyond diabetes (yes/no). Associations were evaluated using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression with odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Overall, 86.3% prescribed GLP-1–based therapy and 68.1% prescribed beyond diabetes. Among prescribers, 37.7% used slower-than-label titration due to GI tolerability and 28.3% reported GI-AE discontinuation in the prior 6 months. Beyond-diabetes prescribing was independently associated with formal incretin training (aOR 2.48, 95% CI 1.23–5.00) and endocrinology vs family medicine specialty (aOR 3.12, 95% CI 1.27–7.69), while higher perceived GI-AE burden (aOR 0.71 per Likert point, 95% CI 0.52–0.98) and access-barrier severity (aOR 0.66 per Likert point, 95% CI 0.44–0.98) reduced the odds of beyond-diabetes prescribing. Conclusion: Beyond-diabetes GLP-1 prescribing is common and is shaped by training and specialty context, but constrained by GI tolerability and access barriers, supporting targeted education and implementation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badar et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Clinician prescribing patterns of GLP-1 receptor agonists (n=160). Formal incretin-therapy training vs. No formal training was evaluated on Clinician-reported prescribing of GLP-1-based therapies beyond diabetes management (aOR 2.48, 95% CI 1.23-5.00, p=0.011). Formal incretin training significantly increased the odds of clinicians prescribing GLP-1 therapies beyond diabetes management (aOR 2.48).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: