Key result
Pediatric myocarditis improves on follow-up CMR, but LGE persists in ~80% of patients.
Why the study?
Acute myocarditis in children has a broad clinical spectrum and the role of baseline and follow-up CMR findings in relation to clinical and laboratory markers needed evaluation.
Does cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) detect significant interval changes in myocardial tissue characteristics and ventricular function during follow-up of pediatric acute myocarditis?
Observational (n=139)
No
Does cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) detect significant interval changes in myocardial tissue characteristics and ventricular function during follow-up of pediatric acute myocarditis?
p-value: p=<0.05
In pediatric acute myocarditis, follow-up CMR reveals significant improvements in ventricular function and tissue characteristics, although myocardial scar (LGE) often persists.
Follow-up CMR may aid recovery assessment in pediatric myocarditis but should not yet change practice; leaves open prognostic value of persistent LGE.
Objectives: Acute myocarditis in children has a broad clinical spectrum, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is an important non-invasive tool for diagnosis and follow-up. This study aimed to evaluate baseline and follow-up CMR findings in pediatric acute myocarditis and their relationship with clinical and laboratory markers of myocardial injury and inflammation. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included pediatric patients who underwent CMR for clinically suspected acute myocarditis. Demographic characteristics, presenting symptoms, laboratory data, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings, and CMR parameters were collected. Follow-up CMR was available in a subset of patients to assess interval changes in myocardial tissue characteristics, including native T1 and T2 mapping values, extracellular volume (ECV), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results: Baseline CMR was performed in 139 pediatric patients with suspected acute myocarditis. Median LVEF was 50% interquartile range (IQR, 33–58): reduced systolic function (LVEF <55%) was observed in 64.7% of the cohort. LGE was identified in 91.4% of patients, with a median extent of 4% (IQR, 3–5). Follow-up CMR performed in 40 patients showed significant improvements in LVEF, native T1 and T2 relaxation times, ECV, and LGE extent (all p<0.05). All 40 patients had LGE at baseline, and LGE remained detectable in 32 patients (80%) at follow-up. Conclusion: Multiparametric CMR provides comprehensive insight in pediatric acute myocarditis. Significant improvement in ventricular function and tissue characterization parameters was observed at follow-up, although LGE remained detectable in 80% of patients. These findings support the role of CMR in both the initial evaluation and follow-up of pediatric myocarditis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kangel et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Pediatric acute myocarditis (n=139). Follow-up vs. Baseline was evaluated on Interval changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and myocardial tissue characteristics (native T1/T2, ECV, LGE extent) (p=<0.05). Follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance in pediatric acute myocarditis showed significant improvements in LVEF, T1/T2, and ECV (all P<0.05), although late gadolinium enhancement persisted in 80%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: