Key result
Adding pericoronary radiomics to CT-FFR is linked to an absolute ~12-point gain in AUC for ischemia.
Why the study?
Pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics may complement CCTA-based anatomical and physiological assessment for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis, but its incremental diagnostic value is unclear.
Does the addition of a CCTA-derived pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics score (Radscore) improve diagnostic accuracy for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis in patients with stable CAD?
Observational (n=81)
Blinded visual quality control of segmentations
No
Does the addition of a CCTA-derived pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics score (Radscore) improve diagnostic accuracy for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis in patients with stable CAD?
Effect estimate: ΔAUC 0.117 (95% CI 0.005–0.229)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.879% vs 0.762%
p-value: p=0.041
The addition of a CCTA-derived lesion-specific pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics score to CT-FFR or diameter stenosis significantly improves diagnostic discrimination for hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses.
Background Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) radiomics may complement coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based anatomical and physiological assessment. This study aimed to evaluate its incremental diagnostic value for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Methods This retrospective study screened 21,438 consecutive patients and included 81 patients with 107 target vessels who underwent CCTA, invasive coronary angiography, and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement within 30 days. Patients were allocated at the patient level to training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. A radiomics score (Radscore) was developed from lesion-specific PCAT features using training-only preprocessing and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Models incorporating diameter stenosis (DS), CCTA-derived FFR (CT-FFR), fat attenuation index (FAI), and Radscore were evaluated against invasive FFR ≤0.80 using patient-cluster bootstrap inference. Results The training and validation cohorts comprised 57 and 24 patients with 75 and 32 vessels, respectively, without patient overlap. In validation, Radscore alone had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.684 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.451–0.873). CT-FFR+ Radscore showed higher discrimination than CT-FFR alone (AUC, 0.879 vs. 0.762; difference, 0.117; 95% CI, 0.005–0.229; P = 0.041), as did DS+ Radscore vs. DS alone (AUC, 0.812 vs. 0.619; difference, 0.193; 95% CI, 0.018–0.367; P = 0.030). The FAI comparison was not significant ( P = 0.238). At training-derived cutoffs, CT-FFR+ Radscore had lower sensitivity (50.0% vs. 78.6%) and negative predictive value (69.6% vs. 81.3%) but higher specificity (88.9% vs. 72.2%). Conclusions Adding Radscore was associated with higher discrimination for CT-FFR and DS in internal validation but did not uniformly improve threshold-dependent classification. Independent external validation is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Stable coronary artery disease (n=81). CT-FFR + Radscore vs. CT-FFR alone was evaluated on Hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis (invasive FFR ≤0.80) in the validation cohort (ΔAUC 0.117, 95% CI 0.005–0.229, p=0.041). Adding pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics to CT-FFR significantly improved discrimination for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis compared to CT-FFR alone (AUC 0.879 vs. 0.762).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: