Key result
Watchman FLX achieves ~100% implantation success in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Watchman FLX device requires evaluation of procedural success, peri-procedural complications, and one-year clinical outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
What are the procedural success and safety outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion with the Watchman FLX device in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=100)
No
What are the procedural success and safety outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion with the Watchman FLX device in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Watchman FLX device implantation for LAAO achieves high procedural success in non-valvular AF patients, though clinicians must be aware of significant risks including a 7% major peri-procedural complication rate.
Supports device feasibility in non-valvular AF; extends observational data but leaves open randomized confirmation of safety and efficacy.
Background: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative approach to stroke prevention in selected patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. This single-centre retrospective study describes device implantation, peri-procedural complications and clinical outcomes during the first year after Watchman FLX implantation. Methods: We analysed 100 consecutive patients who underwent LAAO with the Watchman FLX device at Helios Frankenwaldklinik-Hospital, Kronach, Germany, between 2021 and 2024. The primary endpoint was device implantation success, defined as correct device deployment and implantation. The secondary safety endpoint was a composite of major peri-procedural complications within 72 h. Additional clinical outcomes were strokes and mortality at 30 days and one year. Results: The mean age was 70.7 ± 6.5 years, and 47% of patients were female. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.9 ± 1.4, and the mean HAS-BLED score was 4.1 ± 1.0. Device implantation was successful in 100% (95% CI 96.4–100%). The reported peri-procedural complication rate was 7% (95% CI 2.9–13.9%), including major bleeding in 6% (95% CI 2.2–12.6%) and pericardial tamponade in 1% (95% CI 0.0–5.4%). Thirty-day mortality was 2% (95% CI 0.2–7.0%), with no reported strokes (0%; 95% CI 0.0–3.6%). One-year mortality was 11% (95% CI 5.6–18.8%), with one reported stroke (1%; 95% CI 0.0–5.4%). Conclusions: Watchman FLX implantation was achieved in all patients in this cohort. Bleeding was the most frequently reported peri-procedural complication. The low observed stroke proportion should be interpreted alongside the 11% one-year mortality and incomplete imaging surveillance. This uncontrolled descriptive study cannot establish comparative efficacy or comprehensive device safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allakkis et al. (2026) conducted an observational in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=100). Left atrial appendage occlusion with Watchman FLX was evaluated on Device implantation success, defined as correct device deployment and implantation (95% CI 96.4-100). Left atrial appendage occlusion using the Watchman FLX device achieved a 100% implantation success rate (95% CI 96.4-100%) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: