This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective stressor offset does not mark a common onset of recovery: cardiovascular activation may be waning while cortisol is still rising and threat-related cognition persists. This structured narrative review integrates molecular, autonomic, neural, cognitive, and immune evidence on the post-stressor interval, primarily in adult psychosocial-stress paradigms. We propose the Post-Stressor Transition Model (PSTM) as an operational extension of existing recovery and allostatic accounts, not as a newly discovered biological system. Three regulatory functions organize the synthesis: updating whether threat remains current, changing cardiac autonomic influence, and regulating continuing hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical output. Glucocorticoid receptor signaling, catecholamines, endocannabinoids, oxytocin, and vasopressin contribute across these functions. The framework distinguishes objective offset from system-specific extrema, physiological resolution from demonstrated adaptation, and shared timing from directional coupling. Eight propositions specify outcomes, temporal windows, competing explanations, and prespecified effect bounds. Measurement recommendations address cortisol nonresponse, respiratory influences on heart rate variability, assessment reactivity, and multirate sampling. Hormonal state and development modify candidate parameters rather than define fixed response types. No universal recovery threshold or clinically validated transition profile is claimed. The model is useful only if its additional parameters are identifiable, improve independent prediction, and withstand phase-specific experimental tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: