Key result
Warfarin shows no difference in epistaxis incidence compared to DOACs.
Why the study?
Warfarin has been the standard oral anticoagulant for a long time, but its association with higher rates of epistaxis compared to direct oral anticoagulants was unclear.
Cross-Sectional (n=123)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No difference supports neither agent as preferable for epistaxis risk; leaves open need for larger prospective confirmation.
Anticoagulant therapy prevents and treats thromboembolic occasions like profound vein thrombosis, pneumonic embolism, and stroke. Warfarin, a vitamin K bad guy, has been the standard oral anticoagulant for quite some time. The study's main objective is to find that warfarin is associated with higher rates of epistaxis compared to direct oral anticoagulants. This cross-sectional study was conducted at Islamabad Medical and Dental College, Islamabad, from January 2023 till July 2023. Data was collected from 123 patients of both genders. The study population consists of adult patients prescribed anticoagulant therapy for various indications, including atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and mechanical heart valve replacement. Patients were identified from electronic medical records at the study site. In this study, a total of 123 adult patients receiving anticoagulant therapy were included. Among them, 62 patients were prescribed warfarin, and 61 were on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, or edoxaban). Warfarin and DOACs demonstrated similar safety profiles regarding other bleeding events and major adverse events. It is concluded that the study found no statistically significant difference in the incidence of epistaxis between the two treatment groups. Both Warfarin and DOACs showed similar safety profiles regarding other bleeding events and major adverse events, indicating that they are generally well-tolerated options for anticoagulation therapy in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AHMED et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Thromboembolic conditions requiring anticoagulation (n=123). Warfarin vs. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was evaluated on Incidence of epistaxis. Warfarin was associated with no statistically significant difference in the incidence of epistaxis compared to direct oral anticoagulants among 123 adult patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: