Key result
Preemptive Impella 5.5 yields ~6% post-cardiotomy cardiac failure rate in high-risk cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
The safety and feasibility of preemptive transvalvular mechanical circulatory support with Impella 5.5 in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery was not established.
Does preemptive Impella 5.5 support provide safe and feasible mechanical circulatory support in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing conventional cardiac surgery?
Does preemptive Impella 5.5 support provide safe and feasible mechanical circulatory support in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing conventional cardiac surgery?
Preemptive use of Impella 5.5 for transvalvular left ventricular unloading prior to bypass separation appears safe and feasible in high-risk patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing conventional cardiac surgery.
Supports safety/feasibility of preemptive Impella 5.5 in high-risk surgery; leaves open efficacy versus controls in randomized trials.
Structured Abstract Objectives To assess the safety and feasibility of Impella 5.5-protected cardiac surgery in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Methods IMPACT is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study assessing the safety and feasibility of initiation of transvalvular left ventricular unloading prior to separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. Eligible patients had a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction with planned elective or urgent conventional cardiac surgery. Patients were supported with the Impella 5.5 for at least 24 hours post-operation. Key exclusion criteria included pre-operative inotropic or mechanical circulatory support. A clinical events committee adjudicated endpoint events. Results One hundred subjects were enrolled at 18 sites in the United States, all of whom successfully received the Impella 5.5. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 25% (IQR: 21.6, 28.9%) and STS-PROM was 4.1% (IQR: 2.5, 7.1%). The index cardiac procedure was primarily isolated coronary artery bypass graft (56%) or coronary artery bypass graft+valve (35%). Post-cardiotomy cardiac failure through hospital discharge, the primary effectiveness endpoint, occurred in 6% of subjects. The composite of all-cause mortality, stroke and new requirement for renal replacement therapy through 90 days post-operation, primary safety endpoint, occurred in 12% of subjects. The 30- and 90-day mortality were 2% and 4%, respectively. Subjects had a favorable post-operative trajectory with low perioperative VIS (VIS max <10 within 24 hours post-operation), timely extubation (14.4 hours) and acceptable hospital length of stay (13.9 days). Conclusions Impella 5.5-protected cardiac surgery appears safe, feasible and is a promising device supported strategy for cardiac surgery patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldstein et al. (2026) studied Severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery (n=100). Impella 5.5 was evaluated on Post-cardiotomy cardiac failure through hospital discharge (primary effectiveness). Preemptive mechanical circulatory support with Impella 5.5 in high-risk cardiac surgery patients resulted in a 6% rate of post-cardiotomy cardiac failure through hospital discharge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: