Key result
ENDEAVOR trial publication outlines protocol and site details for mitiperstat without clinical results.
Why the study?
Myeloperoxidase-derived oxidants contribute to mechanisms implicated in heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction, but the effect of MPO inhibition on symptoms and exercise function was unknown.
Does mitiperstat improve symptoms and exercise function in patients with heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction?
RCT
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does mitiperstat improve symptoms and exercise function in patients with heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction?
Mitiperstat is safe and well-tolerated but does not improve heart failure symptoms or exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF.
Myeloperoxidase (MPO)-derived oxidants reduce nitric oxide bioavailability and promote coronary microvascular dysfunction, cardiomyocyte stiffening and interstitial fibrosis-mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction. Here, in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm, parallel-group phase 2b trial of patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction of >40%, we evaluated whether treatment with the MPO inhibitor mitiperstat versus placebo for 48 weeks improved symptoms and exercise function at 16 weeks (the co-primary endpoints were the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)). Secondary endpoints included changes in natriuretic peptides and inflammatory markers (up to 48 weeks) and echocardiographic parameters (up to 24 weeks). In total, 711 patients (45% women) were randomized 1:1:1 to mitiperstat 2.5 mg, mitiperstat 5 mg or placebo. Mitiperstat (pooled doses) did not improve KCCQ-TSS (placebo-corrected difference in mean change from baseline, -1.4 points (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.9, 1.2; P = 0.29), 6MWD (3.8 m (95% CI -3.1, 10.8)); P = 0.28) or any secondary endpoint. Adverse and serious adverse events, including infections, were similar among groups except for maculopapular rash (mitiperstat, 3.6%; placebo, 0.4%). These results indicate that mitiperstat was safe and well tolerated but did not improve symptoms or exercise function in chronic heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04986202 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lund et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction. Mitiperstat (AZD4831) vs. Placebo was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: