Key result
Strong statins linked to ~54% lower risk of cardiovascular events vs. no statins.
Why the study?
The effects of different statins on clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with coronary stent implants and chronic kidney disease were unclear.
Cohort (n=5,801)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support statin consideration in mild-to-moderate CKD; observational data leave open causality and RCT confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of different statins on the clinical outcomes of Japanese patients with coronary stent implants. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 5,801 consecutive patients (males, 4,160; age, 69.7±11.1 years, mean±SD) who underwent stent implantation between April 2008 and March 2011. They were treated with a strong statin (n=3,042, 52%, atorvastatin, pitavastatin, or rosuvastatin), a regular statin (n=1,082, 19%, pravastatin, simvastatin, or fluvastatin) or no statin (n=1,677, 29%). The patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were divided into mild-to-moderate CKD (30≤eGFR<60, n=1,956) and severe CKD (eGFR <30, n=559). Primary endpoints included cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, including stent thrombosis and ischemic stroke. The clinical outcome for the primary endpoint in mild-to-moderate CKD patients treated with a strong statin (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.81; P=0.005) was significantly lower than in those on no statins, but that in the patients treated with a regular statin was not (P=0.160). The clinical outcome for the primary endpoint in severe CKD patients treated with a strong or regular statin was no different than not being on statin therapy (P=0.446, P=0.194, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild-to-moderate CKD, only strong statins were associated with lower risk compared with no statin, but regular statins were not. It is possible that taking a strong statin from the early stage of CKD is useful for suppression of cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishii et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease following coronary stent implantation (n=5,801). Strong statins (atorvastatin, pitavastatin, or rosuvastatin) vs. No statin therapy was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, including stent thrombosis and ischemic stroke (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.64, p=<0.001). Exposure to strong statins was associated with a 54% lower risk of cardiovascular events (HR 0.46) compared to no statin overall, with a significant benefit also demonstrated in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease (HR 0.50).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: