Key result
ECGWmark preserves >90% extraction accuracy under temporal shifts, showing mixed downstream diagnostic effects.
Why the study?
Secure transmission of ECG signals is challenging due to fragility of traditional watermarking against temporal desynchronization and loss of diagnostic details in existing deep watermarking methods.
Does ECGWmark improve watermarking robustness against temporal desynchronization while preserving diagnostic fidelity in ECG signals compared to traditional methods?
Does ECGWmark improve watermarking robustness against temporal desynchronization while preserving diagnostic fidelity in ECG signals compared to traditional methods?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ECGWmark demonstrates that deep learning-based watermarking can successfully embed metadata into ECG signals with high robustness to temporal desynchronization, though with mixed effects on downstream diagnostic classifier performance.
Secure transmission of electrocardiogram (ECG) signals remains a major challenge in telecardiology. While traditional mathematical watermarking can embed patient metadata directly into ECG signals, it is highly fragile against temporal desynchronization such as circular phase shifts. In contrast, existing deep watermarking approaches for temporal signals, such as audio, typically rely on lossy quantization, which compromises the high-frequency micro-morphological details critical for clinical diagnosis. To bridge this gap, we propose ECGWmark, a fully convolutional and quantization-free deep watermarking framework for medical time-series. ECGWmark operates in a continuous, full-resolution latent space and utilizes a localized frame-level mechanism to improve the robustness to severe desynchronization. Crucially, we introduce a differentiable Physiological Loss guided by a clinical classifier to preserve diagnostic semantics. Experiments on the benchmark MIT-BIH database show that ECGWmark maintains channel-bit extraction accuracy above 90% under the evaluated circular temporal shifts. Furthermore, under a rigorous inter-patient diagnostic evaluation, Class-V sensitivity changes from 71.97% to 76.50%, whereas Macro-F1 changes from 35.25% to 34.71% and Class-S sensitivity from 8.89% to 1.39%; these results indicate mixed class-level effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied Arrhythmia (Electrocardiogram Signals) (n=44). ECGWmark vs. Unwatermarked signals and traditional watermarking methods (LSB, DCT-SVD, SchurMark) was evaluated on Channel-bit extraction accuracy and exact message recovery under signal distortions. ECGWmark maintained channel-bit extraction accuracy above 90% under circular temporal shifts and achieved 90.41% to 99.86% exact 16-bit recovery, with mixed effects on downstream diagnostic accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: