Key result
Dilute thrombin time, ecarin-based assays, and anti-Xa activity show excellent linearity with drug concentrations for quantification of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban.
Why the study?
Laboratory measurement of anticoagulant activity of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban is desirable in special situations, but evidence summarizing assay performance is needed.
Which laboratory coagulation assays accurately measure the anticoagulant activity and drug concentrations of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban?
Systematic Review
Which laboratory coagulation assays accurately measure the anticoagulant activity and drug concentrations of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Specific assays like dilute thrombin time and ecarin-based assays reliably quantify dabigatran, while anti-Xa activity reliably quantifies rivaroxaban and apixaban, whereas routine PT and APTT lack sufficient sensitivity.
Background The target-specific oral anticoagulant agents (TSOACs) do not require routine laboratory monitoring. However, laboratory measurement may be desirable in special situations and populations. Objectives This study’s objective is to systematically review and summarize current evidence regarding laboratory measurement of the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Methods We searched PubMed and Web of Science for studies that reported a relationship between drug levels of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban and coagulation assay results. Study quality was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Results We identified 17 eligible studies for dabigatran, 15 for rivaroxaban, and 4 for apixaban. For dabigatran, a normal thrombin time excludes clinically relevant drug concentrations. The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT) are less sensitive and may be normal at trough drug levels. The dilute thrombin time (R2 0.92–0.99) and ecarin-based assays (R2 0.92–1.00) show excellent linearity across on-therapy drug concentrations and may be used for drug quantification. In terms of rivaroxaban and apixaban, anti-Xa activity is linear (R2 0.89–1.00) over a wide range of drug levels and may be used for drug quantification. Undetectable anti-Xa activity likely excludes clinically relevant drug concentrations. The PT is less sensitive (especially for apixaban); a normal PT may not exclude clinically relevant levels. The APTT demonstrates insufficient sensitivity and linearity for quantification. Conclusions Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban exhibit variable effects on coagulation assays. Understanding these effects facilitates interpretation of test results in TSOAC-treated patients. More information on the relationship between drug levels and clinical outcomes is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cuker et al. (2014) conducted a systematic review in Anticoagulant therapy with target-specific oral anticoagulants. Coagulation assays for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban was evaluated on Relationship between drug levels and coagulation assay results. Dilute thrombin time, ecarin-based assays, and anti-Xa activity show excellent linearity with drug concentrations for quantification of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: