Objective: We examined associations of biological age acceleration with cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic (CKM) syndrome progression and baseline stage burden.Methods: Longitudinal analyses included 326,218 UK Biobank participants, and cross-sectional analyses included 5,228 NHANES adults. PhenoAge and KDMAge acceleration were residuals from regressing each biological age measure on chronological age. We modeled two UK Biobank transitions using cause-specific Cox and competing-risk models and compared NHANES stages using survey-weighted logistic regression.Results: Over a median 13.48 years, 2,567 participants progressed from stage 0/1 to stage 2/3 and 42,835 from stage 1 or 2/3 to stage 4. Per 1-SD increment, PhenoAge acceleration was associated with both transitions [hazard ratios (HRs) 1.234, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.189–1.281; HR 1.208, 95% CI 1.197–1.218]. KDMAge acceleration showed corresponding HRs of 1.229 (95% CI 1.180–1.280) and 1.220 (95% CI 1.207–1.232), all P < 0.001. Results remained directionally consistent after accounting for competing mortality. Associations for dichotomized accelerated aging remained significant after false discovery rate correction, and UK Biobank splines suggested possible non-linearity. In NHANES, PhenoAge acceleration was associated with stages 1, 2/3, and 4 versus stage 0. Corresponding odds ratios (ORs) were 1.154 (95% CI 1.107–1.202), 1.221 (95% CI 1.176–1.268) and 1.333 (95% CI 1.249–1.423), all P < 0.001. KDMAge acceleration ORs were 1.025 (95% CI 1.006–1.044; P = 0.012), 1.038 (95% CI 1.019–1.057; P < 0.001), and 1.041 (95% CI 1.011–1.073; P = 0.010).Conclusions: Biological age acceleration was associated with CKM progression and baseline burden. KDMAge comparability remains uncertain. Incremental predictive and clinical utility remained untested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: