This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose Thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary metastases offers a minimally-invasive approach but requires preoperative localization due to absent tactile feedback. CT-guided methylene blue staining (MBS) was implemented to facilitate resection of pulmonary metastases, including intermediate-to-deep lesions. Methods We retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients (0–18 years) undergoing resection of pulmonary metastases (2007–2024). Lesion depth was classified as superficial (≤ 10 mm), intermediate (11–20 mm), or deep (> 20 mm). Primary endpoint was completeness of resection; secondary endpoints included perioperative and oncological outcomes. Subgroup analysis included patients with ≤ 2 pulmonary metastases. Results Fifty-eight resections in 43 patients were included: 49 open, and 9 thoracoscopic following CT-guided MBS. Eleven lesions were stained prior to thoracoscopic resection: three superficial, seven intermediate, one deep lesion. All were resected with negative margins, without complications. Thoracoscopy following CT-guided MBS was associated with shorter operative times (65 vs. 157 min, p = 0.01), hospital stay (4.0 vs. 5.6 days, p = 0.01), and time-to-chemotherapy-resumption (2.25 vs. 18.6 days, p = 0.01). No differences were observed in pulmonary recurrence, disease-free interval, or six-month-survival. Conclusion In pediatric patients with up to two pulmonary metastases, CT-guided methylene blue staining provided feasible preoperative localization, facilitating thoracoscopic wedge resection of superficial, intermediate and deep lesions without complications. Prospective multicenter studies should further evaluate efficacy and inclusion criteria.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: