Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the extinction behavior, steady solution branching, and internal reaction structure of NH 3 /NO-air diffusion counterflow flames. Ammonia is the fuel and NO/air mixtures serve as the oxidizer, with the NO mole fraction in the oxidizer ( X NO ) varied from 0.0 to 1.0. The evolution of S-curves, extinction scalar dissipation rates, and flame structure is examined as a function of X NO . The extinction scalar dissipation rate exhibits a non-monotonic dependence on X NO , increasing markedly at intermediate NO levels and decreasing when NO becomes dominant. Additional calculations with fixed oxidizer-side O 2 fraction show that NO addition itself monotonically promotes extinction resistance, indicating that the non-monotonic trend in the original formulation arises from the competition between NO-promoted radical chemistry and the simultaneous weakening of O 2 -supported branching as NO replaces air. Sensitivity and chemical-pathway analyses show that extinction control shifts from conventional O 2 -driven branching in NH 3 /air flames to NHx-NO coupling at elevated X NO , with reactions, e.g., NH 2 + NO ⇌ NNH + OH playing a key promoting role. At high NO fractions ( X NO >0.6), folded S-curves emerge, yielding a high-temperature strong-flame branch characterized by temperatures exceeding 2,600 K, elevated radical levels, and multiple heat release rate (HRR) peaks. The strong flame is characterized by higher temperatures and radical concentrations, enhanced H/O/OH–N coupling, faster NH₃–NHₓ conversion, and stronger N/NO-driven heat release than the normal flame. Moreover, the primary HRR peak is governed by NH 3 consumption by H-abstraction, whereas the secondary and tertiary peaks arise from NO-related oxidation-reduction chemistry. As the scalar dissipation rate changes and temperature decreases, the multi-zone HRR structure collapses sequentially. Additional radiative calculations show that radiation mainly affects the low-strain extinction branch by introducing weak-flame turning points. Multi-mechanism comparisons and robustness analysis further confirm that the key observations are not artifacts of a particular chemical mechanism or numerical setup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: