The green transition remains at the core of current policy agendas as societies respond to the threats associated with climate change. Previous research has pointed to the possible distributional consequences of the green transition, but much of this discussion remains closer to hypothetical scenarios than to empirical evidence. This paper examines whether Europe’s green transition is associated with mobility intentions that may amplify regional inequality. We link MOBI-TWIN microdata on intentions to move (by time horizon) along with respondents’ green preferences to NUTS2 indicators of regional green transition performance, opportunities, and vulnerability, alongside standard regional controls. Multilevel logit estimates indicate that, among respondents who report an intended destination, opportunity-rich green regions are more likely to be reported, and this association is stronger at longer time horizons. Green preferences are a strong individual predictor of intending to move and are associated with modest differences in the regional profiles of stated long-run destinations: Greener-performing destinations are more often reported by highly pro-environmental individuals, while vulnerable destinations are less often reported by this group. The results suggest that an uneven distribution of green opportunities may translate into unequal future population dynamics across regions. From a policy perspective, this points to the need to complement risk-compensation with place-based capability building and the diffusion of green opportunities in lagging regions, so that the transition supports cohesion rather than divergence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ritter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: