Concentric ring arrays radiate nearly azimuth-invariant sidelobes, but a realizable excitation must respect a finite amplitude resolution and a bounded feed dynamic range. Low-sidelobe design is cast as a second-order cone program in the per-ring excitations, the dynamic range ratio (DRR) is imposed as a convex constraint, and the b-bit quantization is solved by a mixed-integer second-order cone program coupling Dinkelbach fractional programming with cutting-plane sidelobe sampling, returning an optimality certificate. A deterministic greedy engine solves the same discrete problem without a solver, and the ring radii are updated by sequential convex programming with the quantized, DRR-bounded amplitude re-solved at each step. On a 385-element geometry without a DRR ceiling, the certified engine equals or exceeds re-implemented Firefly and particle-swarm designs at every resolution in a third of their runtime, while the greedy engine stays within 0.36 dB two orders of magnitude faster. A method-of-moments model with mutual coupling shows the array-factor model overstates a 4-bit design by 3.6 dB, chiefly through lost rotational invariance; re-solving the identical programs on the full-wave operator recovers 1.5 dB. Unconstrained, the certified design also has lower DRR and 0.20 dB less taper loss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le Trong Phuoc Bui (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: