Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ignition of porous lignocellulosic fuel beds by weak smouldering sources is governed by moisture, bed-structure and airflow conditions, yet the transition to sustained flaming remains poorly quantified. We examined Quercus fabri leaf-litter fuel beds under a full-factorial combination of five fuel moisture contents (FMC) levels on a dry-mass basis, five packing ratios and five nominal airflow velocities, with 30 replicates per combination (3750 trials). Sustained flaming ignition occurred in 55 trials (1.47%), all at the FMC levels of 0—15% and nominal airflow velocities of 3—5 m/s; treatment-specific probabilities ranged from 0 to 16.7%. Conditional time-to-ignition ranged from 67 to 195 s. Ignition probability generally decreased with FMC and increased with packing ratio and airflow, whereas conditional time-to-ignition increased with FMC and decreased with packing ratio. Classification models achieved ROC-AUC values of 0.8630—0.8721 and PR-AUC values of 0.0700—0.0791 under grouped cross-validation; XGBoost performed best for conditional time-to-ignition ( R 2 = 0.905; RMSE = 9.976 s). SHAP analysis identified packing ratio and airflow as leading contributors to ignition occurrence and FMC as the leading contributor to time-to-ignition. These results characterise a low-probability ignition response in a porous lignocellulosic fuel bed and identify the observed moisture and airflow transition intervals within tested experimental conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: