Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a comparative study of the switched-tank converter (STC) and the cascaded voltage divider (CVD). The operating principles of the STC and the CVD with four times input-to-output conversion ratio (4× ) are discussed. Two design approaches of the CVD are considered, including the high-density CVD (CVD-HD) and the high-efficiency low-density CVD (CVD-LD). The power loss breakdown analysis and system efficiency evaluation are provided for both converters. From these results, it is found that the STC is more efficient and smaller in size than the CVD converter. Gallium nitride (GaN)-based hardware prototypes of both converters are built and tested. The 4× -STC can achieve ~1500-W/in3power density and 98.79% efficiency. The 4× -CVD-LD can achieve 1061-W/in3power density and 98.41% efficiency. Therefore, the 4× -STC has 41% higher power density and 24% less power loss than the 4× -CVD-LD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: