BACKGROUND: Although interferon (IFN)gamma has immunostimulatory functions, it is not essential for the acute rejection of fully allogeneic grafts in mice. It is not known whether IFNgamma plays a critical role in the acute rejection of MHC class I- or MHC class II-disparate allografts. METHODS: We studied the survival of skin allografts transplanted from fully allogeneic (BALB/c), MHC class I-disparate (bml), or MHC class II-disparate (bm12) donors to C57BL/6 wild-type (IFNgamma+/+) and IFNgamma gene-knockout (IFNgamma-/-) recipients. We also investigated the in vitro responses of IFNgamma+/+ and IFNgamma-/- T cells to MHC class II-disparate splenocytes. RESULTS: We found that IFNgamma-/- recipients reject BALB/c and bml skin grafts at the same rate as IFNgamma+/+ mice but are not capable of rejecting bm12 skin. Despite the inability of IFNgamma-/- mice to reject bm12 skin grafts, IFNgamma-/- T cells displayed vigorous proliferation and cytotoxic responses when stimulated with bm12 splenocytes in vitro. Furthermore, priming IFNgamma-/- recipients with bm12 splenocytes enabled these mice to reject bm12 skin grafts at a normal rate and to mount a cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity response to the bm12 antigen. CONCLUSION: The data demonstrate that IFNgamma is not necessary for generating effector mechanisms associated with acute transplant rejection but that it is required for initiating alloimmune responses to MHC class II-disparate skin grafts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ring et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: