Key result
Antiretroviral therapy is linked to reduced aortic stiffness, lowering pulse wave velocity by ~0.2 m/s.
Why the study?
People living with HIV have increased cardiovascular risk underestimated by current stratification systems, with elevated aortic stiffness at diagnosis potentially contributing to future CVD risk.
Does contemporary antiretroviral therapy improve aortic stiffness in newly diagnosed people living with HIV?
Cohort (n=73)
No
Does contemporary antiretroviral therapy improve aortic stiffness in newly diagnosed people living with HIV?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.69% vs 5.93%
p-value: p=0.01
Initiation of contemporary antiretroviral therapy in newly diagnosed people living with HIV is associated with early improvements in aortic stiffness, suggesting a modifiable component of vascular dysfunction.
May warrant early vascular assessment upon HIV diagnosis; leaves open whether PWV refines risk stratification or alters outcomes.
Background People living with HIV (PLWH) are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is underestimated by contemporary risk stratification systems[1]. Subclinical cardiovascular abnormalities may be present at the time of HIV diagnosis and serve as potential substrate for future CVD. Aortic stiffness, as measured with pulse wave velocity (PWV), is a validated predictor of CVD [2,3] and has been shown to be elevated in PLWH at the time of HIV diagnosis compared to HIV-uninfected persons[4]. Purpose To prospectively assess the influence of contemporary antiretroviral therapy (ART) on aortic stiffness in a group of newly diagnosed PLWH in a low- to middle-income setting. Methods A group of ART naïve PLWH with modest cardiovascular risk and free from known CVD, was recruited at the time of HIV diagnosis from the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Aortic stiffness was measured using carotid-femoral PWV on a commercially available device that simultaneously measured the carotid and femoral waveforms on a supine patient in a temperature-controlled room utilising established methodology[4]. The algorithmically-calculated time delay between the upstroke of the carotid and femoral wave-forms provided the transit time (TT). Carotid femoral path distance (path length) was measured using surface anatomy. PWV was calculated as direct path length divided by TT. Aortic distensibility was expressed according to the Bramwell-Hill equation as 3.57/PWV(squared)[5]. ART was initiated and PWV was re-evaluated 9 months later. Results Seventy-three participants completed follow-up and were included. The cohort was relatively young (mean age 32±7 years) with good female representation (n=33, 45%). Most received tenofovir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (n=71, 97%) Half of the group smoked cigarettes. Two participants were controlled hypertensives, and two participants had metabolic syndrome. A significant decrease in PWV (with scaling factor of 0.8) was observed at 9 months of ART (5.93 ±1.0 vs. 5.69 ±1.0 m/s; p=0.01). Aortic distensibility increased significantly as well (0.20 [IQR: 0.16 to 0.26] vs. 0.21 [IQR: 0.19 to 0.27] mmHg-1; p=0.02). Conclusion Improvement in aortic stiffness was observed in a group of newly diagnosed PLWH after 9 months of ART-initiation. This provides evidence of a modifiable component of vascular dysfunction and, in turn, cardiovascular risk with the use of contemporary ART at 9 months. It is unknown if this effect will be sustained long-term. The use of aortic stiffness (alone or in combination with other parameters) as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in the ART era requires further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robbertse et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Newly diagnosed HIV infection (n=73). Antiretroviral therapy (ART) vs. Baseline (Pre-ART) was evaluated on Aortic stiffness (Pulse wave velocity) (p=0.01). Antiretroviral therapy in newly diagnosed people living with HIV significantly reduced aortic stiffness, with pulse wave velocity decreasing from 5.93 to 5.69 m/s at 9 months (p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: