Key result
Intracoronary cell therapy after AMI improves LVEF by ~3 absolute percentage points and reduces infarct size.
Why the study?
Intracoronary cell therapy is being evaluated after acute myocardial infarction with variable impact on left ventricular ejection fraction.
Meta-Analysis (n=698)
Mean Difference: 3 (95% CI 1.9–4.1)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Meta-analysis reveals improved left ventricular ejection fraction and reduced infarct size following cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction, indicating favorable cardiac remodeling.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of clinical trials on intracoronary cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Intracoronary cell therapy continues to be evaluated in the setting of AMI with variable impact on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: We searched the CENTRAL, mRCT, and PubMed databases for controlled trials reporting on intracoronary cell therapy performed in patients with a recent AMI (< or =14 days), revascularized percutaneously, with follow-up of > or =3 months. The primary end point was change in LVEF, and secondary end points were changes in infarct size, cardiac dimensions, and dichotomous clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Ten studies were retrieved (698 patients, median follow-up 6 months), and pooling was performed with random effect. Subjects that received intracoronary cell therapy had a significant improvement in LVEF (3.0% increase [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9 to 4.1]; p < 0.001), as well as a reduction in infarct size (-5.6% [95% CI -8.7 to -2.5]; p < 0.001) and end-systolic volume (-7.4 ml [95% CI -12.2 to -2.7]; p = 0.002), and a trend toward reduced end-diastolic volume (-4.6 ml [95% CI -10.4 to 1.1]; p = 0.11). Intracoronary cell therapy was also associated with a nominally significant reduction in recurrent AMI (p = 0.04) and with trends toward reduced death, rehospitalization for heart failure, and repeat revascularization. Meta-regression suggested the existence of a dose-response association between injected cell volume and LVEF change (p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary cell therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI appears to provide statistically and clinically relevant benefits on cardiac function and remodeling. These data confirm the beneficial impact of this novel therapy and support further multicenter randomized trials targeted to address the impact of intracoronary cell therapy on overall and event-free long-term survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lipinski et al. (2007) conducted a meta-analysis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=698). Intracoronary cell therapy vs. Control was evaluated on change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD 3.0%, 95% CI 1.9 to 4.1, p=< 0.001). Intracoronary cell therapy following acute myocardial infarction significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction by 3.0% (95% CI 1.9 to 4.1; p<0.001) and reduced infarct size.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: