Key result
Stem cell therapy post-AMI reduces LVESV by ~5 mL but does not change LVEDV.
Why the study?
Previously published trials on stem cell therapy effects on left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction had small sample sizes and inconsistent conclusions.
Does stem cell therapy improve left ventricular remodeling in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Meta-Analysis (n=832)
Does stem cell therapy improve left ventricular remodeling in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Mean Difference: -1.76 (95% CI -4.61–1.08)
p-value: p=0.233
Stem cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction improves left ventricular contractility (reduces LVESV) but does not significantly affect LV remodeling (LVEDV).
Stem cell therapy improves contractility but not remodeling post-AMI; extends RCT data showing differential volume effects without broad structural benefit.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to perform a meta-analysis of clinical trials that investigated the effects of stem cell therapy on left ventricular remodeling in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Intracoronary injection of stem cells in the acute phase of myocardial infarction has been proposed to replace the cardiomyocytes lost and to prevent deleterious pathological remodeling after myocardial infarction. Previously published trials have investigated the effects of cell therapy on left ventricular (LV) remodeling in AMI patients. However, the sample size of these studies is small and the conclusions are inconsistent. METHODS: Trials were identified in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases, reviews, and reference lists of relevant articles. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated for net changes in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LVEDV and LVESV) by using fixed-effect models. RESULTS: A total of 11 trials (13 comparisons) with 832 participants evaluated the association between stem cell therapy and changes in LVEDV. Compared with the control group, stem cell therapy did not influence the LVEDV changes from baseline to follow-up (WMD: - 1.76 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 4.61 to 1.08 mL, P = 0.233). A total of 9 trials (11 comparisons) with 797 participants evaluated the association between stem cell therapy and changes in LVESV. Compared with the control group, patients in the cell therapy group had a significantly greater reduction in LVESV from baseline to follow-up (WMD: - 5.08 mL, 95% CI: - 7.80 to - 2.37 mL, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that cell therapy improves left ventricular contractility, but has no effect on LV remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2010) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=832). Stem cell therapy vs. Control was evaluated on Net changes in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (WMD -1.76, 95% CI -4.61 to 1.08, p=0.233). Stem cell therapy did not significantly change LVEDV (WMD -1.76 mL; 95% CI -4.61 to 1.08; P=0.233) but significantly reduced LVESV (WMD -5.08 mL; P<0.001) after acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: