Key result
Early invasive therapy cuts 2-year all-cause mortality ~25% vs conservative care in NSTE-ACS.
Why the study?
Although early invasive therapy reduces recurrent unstable angina, the magnitude of benefit on other important adverse outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation ACS is unknown.
Does early invasive therapy improve survival and reduce adverse cardiovascular events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes compared to a conservative approach?
Meta-Analysis (n=8,375)
Does early invasive therapy improve survival and reduce adverse cardiovascular events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes compared to a conservative approach?
Relative Risk: 0.75 (95% CI 0.63–0.9)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.9% vs 6.5%
p-value: p=0.001
Managing non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with an early invasive strategy improves long-term survival and reduces late myocardial infarction and rehospitalization for unstable angina.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to systematically determine whether early invasive therapy improves survival and reduces adverse cardiovascular events in the management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. BACKGROUND: Although early invasive therapy reduces recurrent unstable angina, the magnitude of benefit on other important adverse outcomes is unknown. METHODS: Clinical trials that randomized non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients to early invasive therapy versus a more conservative approach were included for analysis. RESULTS: In all there were 7 trials with 8,375 patients available for analysis. At a mean follow-up of 2 years, the incidence of all-cause mortality was 4.9% in the early invasive group, compared with 6.5% in the conservative group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 0.90, p = 0.001), and at 1 month (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.34, p = 0.43). At 2 years of follow-up, the incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction was 7.6% in the invasive group, versus 9.1% in the conservative group (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.96, p = 0.012), and at 1 month (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.19, p = 0.57). At a mean of 13 months of follow-up, there was a reduction in rehospitalization for unstable angina (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.74, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Managing non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes by early invasive therapy improves long-term survival and reduces late myocardial infarction and rehospitalization for unstable angina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bavry et al. (2006) conducted a meta-analysis in Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (n=8,375). Early invasive therapy vs. Conservative approach was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 2 years (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.90, p=0.001). Early invasive therapy reduced all-cause mortality compared to a conservative approach at 2 years (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.63-0.90; p=0.001) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: