Key result
Genetic FH mutations show no additional MACE risk over non-carriers across similar LDL-C strata.
Why the study?
Whether familial hypercholesterolemia independently increases risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains uncertain.
Does the presence of a genetic FH mutation independently increase the risk of ASCVD compared to individuals without the mutation but similar LDL-C levels?
Cohort (n=2,327)
Does the presence of a genetic FH mutation independently increase the risk of ASCVD compared to individuals without the mutation but similar LDL-C levels?
Hazard Ratio: 1.13 (95% CI 0.91–1.41)
This study demonstrates that absolute LDL-C levels, rather than the presence of a genetic FH mutation, determine the risk of developing ASCVD, suggesting that lipid-lowering intensity should be guided by LDL-C levels.
FH mutation adds no independent MACE risk at matched LDL-C; leaves open whether genetic testing refines ASCVD stratification beyond lipids.
Background Patients with Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are exposed to elevated LDL-C levels from early life. Whether FH independently increases risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains uncertain. Objective To compare the risk of developing ASCVD between individuals with and without FH mutations across different levels of LDL-C. Methods A registry-based, cohort study including patients genetically tested for FH from 1991-2023. Exposure was genetic mutation in the LDL, APOB or PCSK-9 genes within the different LDL groups LDL-C <5 mmol/L, LDL-C 5-7 mmol/L and LDL-C >7 mmol/L. ASCVD was defined as composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) comprising of myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, angina pectoris and stroke. Adjusted cox proportional hazards model was used. Results The study included 2,327 patients, comprising of 958 with FH mutation and 1,369 without. Mean follow-up time was 13.9 ± 9.8 years. LDL-C was significantly associated with risk of future ASCVD with a multivariable adjusted HR of 1.17 (95%CI: 1.13-1.22, p <0.001) per 1 mmol/L increase in LDL-C. No significant difference in risk of MACE was found between those with versus without a genetic FH mutation (LDL-C <5 mmol/L HR 0.91 (95%CI: 0.48;1.74), LDL-C 5-7 mmol/l HR 0.91 (95%CI: 0.68;1.21) and LDL-C >7 mmol/L HR 1.13 (95%CI: 0.91;1.41)) using patients without FH as reference. Conclusion Genetic FH mutation did not confer additional risk when compared to individuals without an FH mutation but with similar LDL-C levels. These findings suggest that LDL-C levels - rather than FH mutation status - should guide the intensity of lipid-lowering therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laursen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Familial hypercholesterolemia (n=2,327). Genetic mutation for familial hypercholesterolemia (LDL, APOB or PCSK-9) vs. Individuals without a genetic FH mutation was evaluated on ASCVD (composite major adverse cardiac events comprising myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, angina pectoris and stroke) (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.41). A genetic FH mutation did not confer additional risk of MACE compared to individuals without a mutation across similar LDL-C strata (e.g., HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.41 for LDL-C >7 mmol/L).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: