Key result
Post-CIED tricuspid regurgitation progression links to ~64% higher risk of cardiovascular hospitalization.
Why the study?
Tricuspid regurgitation progression after cardiac implantable electronic device implantation is recognized but its prognostic impact on long-term clinical outcomes remains incompletely defined.
Does tricuspid regurgitation progression after cardiac implantable electronic device implantation predict mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization in CIED recipients?
Cohort (n=303)
No
Does tricuspid regurgitation progression after cardiac implantable electronic device implantation predict mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization in CIED recipients?
p-value: p=<0.001
Tricuspid regurgitation worsens in about one-third of CIED recipients within the first year, which independently predicts subsequent cardiovascular hospitalization and highlights the need for post-implant echocardiographic surveillance.
Introduction Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression is a recognized complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, yet its prognostic impact on long‐term clinical outcomes remains incompletely defined. Methods and Results In this single‐center retrospective cohort, 303 patients undergoing CIED implantation between 2005 and 2023 were followed for a median of 4.8 years. TR severity was assessed echocardiographically at baseline and 12 months. The primary endpoint was TR progression (≥ 1‐grade worsening); secondary endpoints were all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization, their composite, and progression to severe TR, analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression. TR progressed in 103 patients (34.0%), regressed in 33 (10.9%), and remained stable in 167 (55.1%), a net rightward shift ( p < 0.001). Progression differed by device type ( p = 0.031): among the larger subgroups, VVI‐ICD showed the greatest net progression (31.8% worsened vs. 6.9% improved; p < 0.001) and CRT‐D the highest regression (18.8%). During follow‐up, 67 patients (22.1%) died and 164 (54.1%) were hospitalized. Overall TR progression was not independently associated with mortality (HR 1.118, p = 0.693) but independently predicted cardiovascular hospitalization (HR 1.640, p = 0.003) and the composite endpoint (HR 1.480, p = 0.014). On unadjusted analysis, progression specifically to severe TR ( n = 15) was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.99, p = 0.024) and cardiovascular hospitalization (HR 2.45, p < 0.001). Conclusion TR progression occurs in approximately one‐third of CIED recipients within the first year and independently predicts cardiovascular hospitalization. Progression to severe TR identifies a higher‐risk subset, supporting routine post‐implant echocardiographic surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urgancı et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=303). Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation was evaluated on TR progression (≥ 1-grade worsening) (p=<0.001). Tricuspid regurgitation progression occurred in 34.0% of CIED recipients within the first year and independently predicted cardiovascular hospitalization (HR 1.640, P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: