Key result
Active visual search increases heart rate, reduces HRV, and synchronizes saccades to exhalation versus tracking.
Why the study?
Most evidence on how bodily rhythms influence perception and action comes from passive paradigms with limited participant control over sensory acquisition.
Does active visual search, compared to visual tracking, alter the coupling of saccadic eye movements to cardiorespiratory cycles in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=55)
Does active visual search, compared to visual tracking, alter the coupling of saccadic eye movements to cardiorespiratory cycles in adults?
Saccadic eye movements are temporally coupled to respiratory and cardiac cycles, a fundamental physiological synchronization that persists across both active and passive visual tasks.
Extends cardiorespiratory-perceptual coupling to active vision; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Bodily rhythms, including respiration and cardiac activity, influence perception and action. However, most evidence comes from passive paradigms in which participants have limited control over how sensory information is acquired. Here, we investigated whether saccadic eye movements are coupled to cardiorespiratory cycles and whether this coupling differs between active visual search and visual tracking. Fifty-five adults completed a task in which a Gabor patch was concealed by an image and revealed through a viewing window that either followed their own gaze (active search) or replayed another participant’s gaze trajectory (visual tracking). We recorded eye movements, electrocardiography, and respiration, and assessed interoceptive sensibility using the Three-domain Interoceptive Sensations Questionnaire (THISQ). Compared with visual tracking, active search elicited higher heart rate, reduced heart rate variability (HRV), faster breathing, and greater pupil dilation, alongside larger saccades and longer fixations. Across both conditions, saccades were preferentially initiated during mid-to-late exhalation. Saccade timing was also non-uniformly distributed across the cardiac cycle, revealing two subgroups with distinct phase preferences for systole or diastole. Neither coupling strength nor preferred phase differed significantly between conditions. Cardiorespiratory deceleration around trial onset further suggested that participants may have adjusted their bodily rhythms to task structure in both conditions. Interoceptive sensibility was not associated with coupling strength. Together, these findings indicate that saccadic eye movements are temporally coupled to both respiratory and cardiac cycles, with consistent respiratory phase preferences but substantial individual variability in cardiac phase preferences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramírez et al. (2026) reported a cross-sectional. Active visual search vs. Visual tracking was evaluated on Coupling of saccadic eye movements to cardiorespiratory cycles. Active visual search elicited higher heart rate, reduced heart rate variability, and faster breathing compared with visual tracking, with saccades preferentially initiated during mid-to-late exhalation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: