Key result
TIMI 0 culprit occlusion in ACS is linked to ~2.1-fold higher 1-year mortality.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Multiple definitions of occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) have been proposed, but their frequency and comparative prognostic relevance across the ACS spectrum remain unclear.
Do alternative definitions of occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) predict 1-year mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Observational (n=6,558)
Do alternative definitions of occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) predict 1-year mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Hazard Ratio: 2.08 (95% CI 1.56–2.78)
Defining occlusion myocardial infarction by impaired culprit artery flow provides prognostic value beyond the conventional STE/NSTE-ACS classification and identifies NSTE-ACS patients with a mortality risk similar to STEMI.
TIMI 0 occlusion MI identifies higher-risk ACS; extends OMI definitions but remains hypothesis-generating for refined stratification.
BACKGROUND Occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) refers to a myocardial infarction caused by a persistent or transient, complete or near-complete coronary artery occlusion. Multiple definitions have been proposed, yet their frequency and comparative prognostic relevance remain unclear. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the frequency and prognosis of previously proposed OMI definitions across the whole spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) from the MATRIX trial. METHODS Five alternative OMI definitions were assessed: 1) culprit artery (CA) TIMI flow grade 0; 2) CA-TIMI flow grade 0-1; 3) CA-TIMI flow grade 0-2; 4) CA-TIMI flow grade 0-2 or TIMI flow grade 3 with cardiac troponin >30× upper reference limit; and 5) CA-TIMI flow grade 0-2 or CA-TIMI flow grade 3 with cardiac troponin >100× upper reference limit. The endpoint of interest was 1-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS Among 6,558 patients with ACS, OMI frequency ranged from 37.8% for definition 1 to 76.1% for definition 4. OMI was independently associated with higher 1-year mortality according to definitions 1-4 (adjusted HR: 2.08 [95% CI: 1.56-2.78], 1.97[1.47-2.63], 1.70 [1.25-2.32], 1.47 [1.01-2.12], respectively) but not according to definition 5 (adjusted HR: 1.26 [0.90-1.75]). OMI definitions exclusively based on impaired CA flow (ie, definitions 1-3) improved discrimination, reclassification, and model fit when added to the conventional STE/NSTE-ACS classification. One-year mortality did not differ among patients with NSTE-ACS with OMI definition 1 or 2 compared with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) patients. CONCLUSIONS OMI defined by impaired CA flow confers prognostic implications beyond the presence or absence of ST-segment elevation in a broad ACS population and identifies patients without ST-segment elevation with 1-year mortality similar to that of STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milzi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndromes (n=6,558). Occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) defined by impaired culprit artery flow vs. Absence of OMI was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.56-2.78). Occlusion myocardial infarction defined by culprit artery TIMI flow grade 0 was independently associated with higher 1-year mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes (HR 2.08; 95% CI 1.56-2.78).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: