Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial

Background Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators correct the basic defect caused by CFTR mutations. Improvements in health outcomes have been achieved using the combination of a CFTR corrector and potentiator in people with CF (pwCF) homozygous for F508del. The addition of elexacaftor (ELX; VX-445), a next-generation CFTR corrector, to tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA) further improved F508del-CFTR function and clinical outcomes in a phase 2 study in pwCF homozygous for F508del. Methods A phase 3, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled trial of ELX in triple combination with TEZ/IVA (ELX/TEZ/IVA) in pwCF homozygous for F508del was conducted. Eligible participants were aged ≥12 years with stable disease and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) of 40 to 90, inclusive. After a four-week TEZ/IVA run-in, participants were randomised 1:1 to four weeks of ELX/TEZ/IVA versus TEZ/IVA alone. The primary endpoint was absolute change from baseline (measured at the end of the TEZ/IVA run-in) in ppFEV1 at week 4. Key secondary endpoints were absolute change in sweat chloride and CF Questionnaire–Revised respiratory domain (CFQ-R RD) score. ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03525548. Findings Between August and December 2018, 113 participants were enrolled. Following the run-in, 107 participants were randomised and completed the 4-week treatment period. The ELX/TEZ/IVA group had improvements in ppFEV1 (10·0 percentage points, 95% CI 7·4 to 12·6, p<0·0001), sweat chloride concentration (−45·1 mmol/L, 95% CI −50·1 to −40·1, p<0·0001), and CFQ-R RD score (17·4 points, 95% CI 11·8 to 23·0, p<0·0001) compared with the TEZ/IVA group. ELX/TEZ/IVA was well tolerated, with no discontinuations. Most adverse events were mild or moderate; serious adverse events occurred in 4% (n=2) of participants receiving ELX/TEZ/IVA and 2% (n=1) receiving TEZ/IVA. Interpretation ELX/TEZ/IVA provided clinically robust benefit vs TEZ/IVA alone with a favourable safety profile and demonstrates the potential to lead to transformative improvements in the lives of pwCF homozygous for F508del.