Vegetation restoration commonly increases soil organic carbon (SOC) and macroaggregate abundance. However, it remains unclear whether macroaggregate-centered SOC recovery is coupled with greater incorporation of restoration-derived C into finer aggregate fractions or remains largely confined to macroaggregates. Here, we compared active cropland with two woody vegetation types restored for 24 years, forestland and shrubland, in the hilly-gully region of the Loess Plateau. We quantified plant inputs, soil properties, aggregate structure, SOC pools, δ 13 C signatures, new/old C allocation, and Δ δ 13 C -based isotopic distances at 0–10 and 10–20 cm. Vegetation restoration enriched macroaggregates and increased bulk-soil SOC storage by 75.5–79.3% in the 0–10 cm layer and by 24.3–24.6% in the 10–20 cm layer. Macroaggregates dominated restored SOC storage, contributing 67.3–71.8% in topsoil and 64.0–64.7% in subsoil, compared with 58.4% and 58.8% in cropland, respectively. Newly derived C accounted for 52.9–74.8% of restored topsoil SOC and was preferentially retained in macroaggregates, whereas finer fractions showed proportionally greater old-C enrichment. In the 0–10 cm layer, macroaggregate-silt + clay isotopic distance was significantly greater in both restored vegetation types than in cropland, whereas macroaggregate-microaggregate and microaggregate-silt + clay distances did not differ significantly among vegetation types. The 10–20 cm pattern was less consistent, with a significant macroaggregate-silt + clay difference detected only between cropland and shrubland. Thus, after 24 years of restoration, newly accumulated C remained concentrated mainly in macroaggregates, without a corresponding strengthening of its association with finer fractions. These findings distinguish where restoration-derived C is stored from how strongly it is associated with finer, potentially more persistent fractions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: