Hand hygiene is a low-cost cornerstone of infection prevention, yet adherence among undergraduates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is often inconsistent due to structural and time-related constraints. This study described knowledge, attitudes and self-reported hand hygiene practices among undergraduates at a Nigerian university, and examined how water access, facility placement and time scarcity relate to practice. Patterns were interpreted through the Capability–Opportunity–Motivation–Behaviour (COM-B) framework to identify opportunity-focused levers for LMIC-university systems. Among 420 respondents (99.5% response rate), mean knowledge and attitude scores were high (10.8/14 and 13.2/16). However, only 41.9% met the composite definition of good practice (always washing after toilet use and before eating, and ≥ 20 s per wash). “Always” washing ranged from 79.8% after toilet use to 10.2% before buying food from canteens. In multivariable analysis, higher knowledge (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10–1.65), higher attitude scores (1.20, 1.02–1.42), reliable water access (1.80, 1.15–2.82) and facility proximity (1.55, 1.02–2.35) independently predicted good practice, while frequent post-class time constraints reduced the odds (0.60, 0.40–0.90). Interpreted through COM-B, capability and motivation were relatively strong, while physical opportunity—WASH access, facility placement and protected time—appeared to be the limiting component.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chinedu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: