Background Mitochondrial damage due to platelet lesions can cause mtDNA release. However, platelet microparticles (MPs) can also transfer mtDNA in a conserved, protected form that may not directly participate in inflammatory signaling. This study investigated storage-dependent partitioning of platelet-derived mtDNA between an MP-enriched fraction and an MP/platelet-depleted supernatant and its relationship with oxidative stress and mitochondrial lesions in apheresis platelets. Methods Six apheresis platelet concentrates were analyzed by flow cytometry for P-selectin expression, phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure, reactive oxygen species (ROS), MP formation, and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP; JC-1 Red/Green-GeoMFI ratio) during storage. Platelet-derived mtDNA was quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in an MP-enriched pellet and the corresponding MP/platelet-depleted supernatant. Results Unlike MMP, platelet activation markers increased during storage. Supernatant mtDNA increased during storage but remained approximately 13-fold lower than mtDNA in the corresponding MP-enriched fraction. Supernatant mtDNA levels were associated with platelet activation, oxidative stress, and MMP loss. As experimental controls, CCCP, a mitochondrial uncoupler, induced greater MMP loss than ABT-737, a BCL-2/BCL-xL inhibitor, whereas ABT-737 produced higher supernatant mtDNA levels. These responses support assay sensitivity to mitochondrial perturbation without establishing a specific cell-death or release mechanism. Conclusion Microparticles represent a major particulate-associated source of platelet-derived mtDNA during storage, whereas the supernatant signal represents an operationally MP/platelet-depleted fraction with substantially lower mtDNA levels. MP-associated mtDNA may represent a biologically conserved form, whereas its accessibility and inflammatory activity may be limited. The pathophysiological significance and precise release mechanism of mtDNA in the supernatant remain to be determined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosseini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: