Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reliable estimation of extreme significant wave height ( H s ) requires threshold and declustering choices that are rarely justified jointly, and Persian Gulf design-wave studies have almost universally been restricted to omnidirectional records despite well-documented directional heterogeneity in the region's wave forcing. This study addresses both gaps through a jointly optimized, multi-criteria peaks-over-threshold framework with simultaneous threshold and declustering interval selection. Candidates are first evaluated against admissibility criteria covering sample size, shape-parameter plausibility, goodness of fit, and storm independence, then ranked using a five-component objective combining predictive cross-validation, goodness of fit, parameter stability, upper-tail accuracy, and sample adequacy. Robustness was confirmed against four alternative weighting scenarios. The framework was applied to hindcast H s records at five Persian Gulf locations, analyzed both omnidirectionally and conditioned on the northwesterly Shamal regime and a secondary directional regime. Selected H s thresholds ranged from 2.49 to 3.30 m, with omnidirectional 100-year H s return levels of 5.27–5.89 m and negative shape parameters of the relevant extreme value distribution throughout. The Shamal-conditioned return level closely matched the omnidirectional 100-year estimate at four of five locations, while a secondary regime provided the closest directional estimate at the north-westernmost location. These results are consistent with the dominant role of Shamal forcing in regional extreme-wave conditions and provide a directionally informed basis for design wave-height estimation in the Persian Gulf.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammad Hossein Kazeminezhad (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: