To determine how anterior conventional support and four controlled ZAGA-informed zygomatic trajectories jointly affect load transfer in hybrid maxillary rehabilitation. A deterministic 2 × 4 finite element experiment used one symmetrized Visible Human Project-derived midface. H4 comprised conventional implants at FDI 12/22 and zygomatic implants at 15/25; H6 added implants at 13/23. Four mirrored 40-mm trajectories varied distal position and maxillary engagement. Manufacturer-derived implant–abutment geometries supported a polymethyl methacrylate prosthesis and cobalt–chromium framework. Eight configurations received unilateral 230-N posterior vertical and 93-N canine oblique loads. Primary outcomes were cortical maximum principal stress P95 (Pmax P95), compression P05 magnitude, loaded zygomatic-fixture von Mises P95, and maximum framework displacement. Bonded linear-static models used a 0.658-mm C3D8 grid; all 16 conditions were repeated with a 1-mm cortical shell. All 16 baseline models met numerical acceptance criteria. From A to D, cortical Pmax P95 decreased by 24.3–24.6% vertically but increased by 21.0–21.7% obliquely. Zygomatic-fixture P95 increased by 15.1% vertically and 37.0–37.9% obliquely; framework displacement increased by 11.5–13.0%. H6 changed primary outcomes by ≤ 1.70% but reduced matched conventional-fixture and abutment P95 by 18.9–33.8% and 24.2–28.4%. A 1-mm shell increased cortical Pmax P95 by 45.8–75.0% and compression P05 magnitude by 49.7–58.9%; the small A-to-D oblique compression increase (0.4–1.3%) became a decrease (3.2–3.7%). Adjacent-grid checks met the < 5% criterion at both shell thicknesses; formal mesh independence was not established. Combined trajectory geometry changed most primary outcomes more than adding two anterior implants. Additional support reduced matched conventional-assembly stress. Cortical thickness substantially affected absolute predictions and some trajectory comparisons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhammet Yasin Pektaş (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: