The profound integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping the frameworks and operations of public governance. While academic interest has surged, extant literature frequently examines GenAI through a siloed lens—treating it either as a governance tool, a regulatory object, or a novel decision-making agent. Such a fragmented perspective obscures the micro-level governance paradoxes and systemic risks that emerge when these roles intersect. To bridge this theoretical gap, this study conceptualizes the public management system as a complex adaptive system, identifying GenAI as an “adaptive agent” within this framework to explore the micro-paradoxes, macro-risk emergence, and governance models driven by its triple identity. The research uses a single-case study of Singapore’s “Smart Nation” initiative. Tracking governance strategies and outcomes across various situations yields general insights for GenAI governance. The findings show a “Governance Impossible Triangle” in GenAI’s triple identity. This triangle has persistent tensions among maximizing efficiency, safeguarding the legitimacy of decisions, and risk control. To resolve these tensions, the study proposes a “Contextual Identity Configuration Model” driven by problem complexity, risk severity, value conflicts, and explainability requirements. By analyzing four prototypical scenarios—routine optimization, professional assistance, high-stakes discretion, and complex crises—the paper elucidates how management systems dynamically recalibrate algorithmic tool-intensity and agentic power through continuous feedback loops. The study concludes that policymakers must move beyond “one-size-fits-all” regulatory approaches toward an agile, context-based governance paradigm. By implementing multi-layered defense systems and joint accountability networks, governments can strive to achieve a profound alignment between technological empowerment and core public values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: