Fe(III) is widely present in non-stoichiometric pyrrhotite (Fe1−xS, 0 < x < 0.125); however, its role in determining the catalytic activity of Fe1−xS remains unclear. Herein, Fe1−xS with varying Fe(III) were prepared via the sulfidation of goethite and the pyrolysis of pyrite at different temperatures, respectively, and subsequently employed to activate peroxydisulfate (PDS) for tetracycline (TC) removal. A combination of characterization and chemical analysis revealed that the Fe(III) content in sulfurized Fe1−xS and pyrolytic Fe1−xS decreased linearly with increasing sulfidation temperature (R2 = 0.9875) and calcination temperature (R2 = 0.9665), respectively. Electrochemical and zeta potential measurements showed that both the electron-transfer capability and surface electronegativity of Fe1−xS increased with increasing Fe(III) content. Importantly, in the Fe1−xS/PDS system, the Fe(III) content in sulfurized Fe1−xS and pyrolytic Fe1−xS was positively correlated with the second-order reaction rate constant (k2, R2 = 0.9276) and first-order reaction rate constant (k1, R2 = 0.9741) for TC removal, respectively, suggesting a clear structure-activity relationship between Fe(III) content and catalytic activity. Meanwhile, Fe release, reactive oxygen species (ROSs) generation, and PDS consumption increased with increasing Fe(III) content in Fe1−xS. In addition, sulfurized Fe1−xS and pyrolytic Fe1−xS show a wide pH operating range and moderate reusability. These findings provide valuable insights into the rational design of Fe1−xS-based catalysts for advanced oxidation processes to remove refractory organic pollutants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: