Micro-thermophotovoltaic systems are promising compact power-generation platforms for low-power applications, but their combustor performance is strongly constrained by coupled requirements of high radiative efficiency, uniform emitter temperature, low pressure drop, and fuel-flexible combustion. This study presents a systematic parametric investigation of an insert-free radial micro-combustor for ammonia–hydrogen MTPV applications using two-dimensional axisymmetric simulations incorporating a previously validated CFD framework, a published NH3/H2 kinetic mechanism benchmarked against experimental data, conjugate heat transfer, and surface-to-surface radiation. The effects of key geometric parameters, including radial expansion ratio, emitter thickness, channel width, and adiabatic section length, are evaluated under a hydrogen baseline condition to isolate geometric influences. The selected configuration is subsequently investigated with ammonia–hydrogen fuel blends to assess fuel-flexibility and thermal management characteristics. The results reveal that the performance improvement is governed not by an isolated geometric effect, but by the coupled interaction among radial-flow redistribution, residence-time control, solid-wall heat redistribution, flame stabilization, and emitter-temperature regulation. The selected configuration within the investigated design matrix achieves a combustor-level radiative efficiency of 55.4%, while maintaining a maximum solid temperature below the material constraint and improving emitter-temperature uniformity. A first-order radiation-to-electricity estimate based on an assumed effective TPV conversion factor is provided only for contextual comparison with previous MTPV combustor studies; it is not a device-specific prediction or a normalized system-level fuel-to-electricity efficiency. The results demonstrate the potential of insert-free radial micro-combustors as compact thermal conversion platforms for application-specific low-power MTPV systems, where thermal management, fuel flexibility, and mechanical simplicity are important design considerations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meygoli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: