This paper develops a reliability and availability model for a repairable two-tier k-out-of-n computer network system. Four analytical components are combined: event-triggered repair intensification, Gumbel–Hougaard copula-based restoration, a semi-Markovian state-transition formulation, and a reinforcement Q-learning layer for adaptive threshold selection. Subsystem 1 consists of n identical web servers operating under a k-out-of-n: G policy. Subsystem 2 contains three identical database replicas under a one-out-of-three: G policy. The full system is available only when both subsystems and both load balancers are operational. State probabilities are derived via the supplementary variable technique and Laplace transforms. The semi-Markovian extension decouples embedded-chain transition probabilities from state-specific holding-time distributions. Stationary availability is expressed as the weighted ratio of mean up-state sojourn times to total mean sojourn times, accommodating non-exponential failure and repair time laws. The event-triggered policy fires repair intensification when the system availability A(t) falls; specifically, when the degradation indicator Ξ(t)=1−A(t) crosses a threshold subject to a minimum inter-event time. A Q-learning agent selects the threshold–gain action from a finite set, updating a Q-table by the Bellman rule. Numerical results from MATLAB 2026 show baseline availability converging to 0.8581, 0.8537, and 0.8496 for k=5, k=15, and k=25. Without repair, reliability reaches 0.0720, 0.0521, and 0.0398 at t=25. The fixed event-triggered policy generates two trigger events per configuration, achieving area-under-the-curve (AUC) gains between 0.5412% and 0.5652%. The Q-learning policy generates three trigger events and achieves larger AUC gains for the stricter configurations: 0.7154% for k=15 and 1.0066% for k=25. These gains are validated by 30 Monte Carlo replications with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals for k=15 and k=25. Under Weibull aging with shape βw=1.8, semi-Markovian stationary availability is lower than the exponential Markov baseline for all values of k.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasappan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: