Introduction Decision making in emergency medicine is influenced by cognitive bias, time pressure, uncertainty, and incomplete or unreliable feedback. Outdoor experiential learning may provide an environment in which these decision-making processes can be experienced and discussed in a practical context. Objective This study evaluated a novel outdoor experiential learning workshop designed to assess changes in emergency medicine residents’ self-reported awareness and understanding of decision-making science. Methods We conducted a prospective single-cohort study of emergency medicine residents participating in an outdoor experiential learning workshop. Residents completed a 15-min asynchronous video lecture during the 2 wk preceding the field day, followed by guided backcountry activities incorporating structured discussions of decision-making science and clinical parallels. Participants completed surveys before and after the workshop and a 3-mo follow-up survey. Descriptive statistics and independent-samples t tests were used to evaluate changes in self-reported decision-making awareness and understanding. Results Thirty residents completed the pre-intervention survey, 21 (70%) completed the post-intervention survey, and 22 (73%) completed the 3-mo follow-up. All measures demonstrated overall improvements from before to after the survey. The largest improvement was in understanding the importance of feedback in decision making (3.53±1.17 vs 4.38±0.74; P =0.001). This improvement maintained statistical significance at the longitudinal follow-up (3.53±1.17 vs 4.09±1.11; P =0.043), reflecting continued appreciation for the value of feedback in decision making. Conclusions Participants reported increased awareness and understanding of decision-making science following the workshop, with several measures remaining elevated at the 3-mo follow-up. Participants also reported high levels of enjoyment and perceived educational value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petelinsek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: